grantcheck

Texas · Higher education · $10M-$50M in federal spending

AUSTIN COLLEGE

SHERMAN, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 3 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score3100

Federal funding, FY2025

$12,627,002 in federal awards spent, across 3 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$12,571,061
Department of Agriculture$43,230
Department of Health and Human Services$10,661

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000387848
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
December 3, 2025
Federal spending
$12,627,002 · 3 programs
Major programs
1
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2025-001

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (84.063)
Compliance requirement
Eligibility
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Pell Awards Significant Deficiency DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ALN #: 84.063 Federal Pell Grants Federal Award Identification #: 2024-2025 Financial Aid Year Condition: The College did not properly award Pell for students enrolled in Summer courses. Criteria: 34 CFR 690.63(b) Questioned Costs: $0 Context: 3 out 40 students tested were not properly awarded Summer Pell awards. The College completed a full file review of Pell eligible students who were enrolled in Summer 2025 courses. During this review, it was discovered that 30 students should have been awarded Pell totaling just under $50,000. These were corrected during the audit. Cause: New Pell calculation regulations for students enrolled in Summer courses were not correctly implemented for the 2024-2025 award year. This was an oversight by management. Effect: Pell was not awarded correctly to students enrolled in Summer courses. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the College update processes to reflect the changes in Pell regulations for students enrolled in Summer courses. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000345038
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
January 9, 2025
Federal spending
$10,339,271 · 3 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000014411
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
January 4, 2024
Federal spending
$10,440,125 · 3 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

Finding 2023-002

other matters

Program
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (84.007, 84.033, 84.038 and 3 more)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.038, and 84.379-Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Award Identification #: 2022-2023 Financial Aid Year Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with the updated requirements of GLBA. Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4 Questioned Costs: $0 Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, implemented sufficient vendor management policies and reviews, or provided a written, annual report to the board. Cause: The College had noted the updated requirements of GLBA and engaged a third party to assist with addressing and documenting compliance with the updated requirements of GLBA. This process took place after fiscal year-end. Effect: The College may have unintended exposure of student information to security risks. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address all updated requirements of GLBA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.