grantcheck

Arizona · Local government · $2M-$10M in federal spending

Casa Grande Union High School District No. 82

Casa Grande, AZ

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$4,567,368 in federal awards spent, across 15 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$2,915,755
Department of Agriculture$1,426,386
Department of Defense$193,514

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000386500
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
January 7, 2026
Federal spending
$4,567,368 · 15 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000066483
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
March 31, 2025
Federal spending
$8,924,860 · 15 programs
Major programs
4
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000033584
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
June 26, 2024
Federal spending
$7,359,975 · 14 programs
Major programs
3
Questioned costs
$66,896 known
Score
18 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND (84.425)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID‐19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: S425D210038, S425U210038 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Education Stabilization Fund grant recipients are required to submit an annual performance report with data on expenditures, planned expenditures, subrecipients, and uses of funds. The District, as subrecipient  of  the  Arizona  Department  of  Education  (ADE),  fulfills  this  requirement  through  completion of ADE's LEA Uses of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief I, II & III (ESSER Report). Condition The District did not maintain adequate supporting documentation for the data included in the ESSER Report submitted to ADE. Cause The  District  did  not  have  adequate  review  procedures  in  place  to  ensure  the  ESSER  Report  was  sufficiently supported, and/or did not maintain documentation utilized when the ESSER Report was prepared. Effect The District was unable to accurately and fully support the data submitted on the ESSER Report. Context The data maintained by the District to support the allocation of costs to specific object codes and expenditures categories for ESSER I, ESSER II, and ESSER III did not agree to the amounts reported to ADE. However, the total amounts expended for ESSER I, ESSER II, and ESSER III were consistent with the District's accounting records. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should ensure that accurate federal reports are prepared and that proper supporting documentation is maintained for all amounts indicated on such reports. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Finding 2023-002

material weaknessquestioned costsother matters

Program
EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND (84.425); SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) (84.027); TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (84.010)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles
Questioned costs
$66,896 (known)
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Repeat Finding: No Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies; Special Education Cluster; COVID‐19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.010; 84.027; 84.027X; 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S010A220003; H027A220007; H027X210007; S425U210038 Questioned Costs: 13,548; 22,644; 30,704 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.303, the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐ Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition The District did not maintain effective internal control over activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles for several grants. Cause The District did not establish adequate controls over the preparation and/or retention of employee pay agreements. Effect The District did not have sufficient documentation to support the rate of pay for 13 employees paid from federal funds, and may have charged unallowable costs to the programs. Context During our review of payroll records, we noted the following: - For two of ten Title I employees reviewed, the rates of pay established in the payroll software were in excess of the approved contracts on file. The questioned cost of $13,548 represents the total excess amount paid to the two employees for the entire fiscal year. - For three of ten Special Education employees reviewed, the rates of pay established in the payroll software were in excess of the approved contracts on file. Additionally, for one of ten Special Education employees reviewed, the District could not locate an approved contract. The questioned cost of $22,644 represents the total excess amount paid to the four employees for the entire fiscal year. - For five of 20 Education Stabilization employees reviewed, the rates of pay established in the payroll software were in excess of the approved contracts on file. Additionally, for two of 20 Education Stabilization employees reviewed, the District could not locate approved contracts. The questioned cost of $30,704 represents the total excess amount paid to the seven employees for the entire fiscal year. The projected questioned costs for the Special Education Cluster could be in excess of $25,000. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should implement and enforce payroll procedures that ensure documentation is maintained which supports costs charged to federal programs. These procedures should include maintaining official, Board‐approved wage agreements for all employees, and implementing additional reviews of pay rates entered into the payroll software. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.