grantcheck

Colorado · Local government · $10M-$50M in federal spending

Cherry Creek School District

Greenwood Village, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$37,450,643 in federal awards spent, across 14 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$22,357,884
Department of Agriculture$15,092,759

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000399047
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
January 29, 2026
Federal spending
$37,450,643 · 14 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000063046
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
November 13, 2024
Federal spending
$55,243,997 · 15 programs
Major programs
2
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2024-001

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (84.010)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with allowable costs and activities. Cherry Creek School District No. 5 (the District) should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions.

Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 out of 15 selections sampled that should not have been charged to the grant. The individual was a substitute teacher with one day of substitute pay incorrectly charged to Title I.

Questioned costs: None

Context: During the year, a substitute teacher who substituted for a Title II teacher was incorrectly charged to Title I. There was no additional review of individuals charged to the grant throughout the year to identify any individuals not allowable under Title I.

Cause: The District did not follow their policy surrounding review of allowable teachers charged to the grant.

Effect: We noted an instance of noncompliance with procedures surrounding review of teachers charged to the grant. The District did not identify a substitute teacher incorrectly charged to the grant until after the year ended.

Repeat Finding: No

Recommendation: We recommend the District review their controls and procedures surrounding review of individuals charged to the grant to ensure allowability under the grant.

Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000015116
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
January 22, 2024
Federal spending
$42,660,513 · 15 programs
Major programs
2
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2023-001

material weaknessother matters

Program
SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) (84.027, 84.173)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Pass-Through Agency: Colorado Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: 4027, 4173, 6027, and 6173 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs and Cost Principles Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters

Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with allowable costs and activities. Cherry Creek School District No. 5 (the District) should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions.

Condition: During our testing, we noted the District did not perform the time and effort certifications for the grant period related to personnel costs charged. In addition, we noted 18 of 40 selections sampled that should not have been charged to the grant. The original personnel costs charged were removed and replaced with allowable personnel costs under the grant for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The final population of personnel costs expended for the grant included supportable allowable costs. The District completed after-the-fact required time and effort certifications to support the final population of personnel costs charged to the grant for the year.

Questioned costs: None.

Context: During the year, teachers outside of the approved list of teachers per the Colorado Department of Education were charged to the grant. There was no additional review of individuals charged to the grant throughout the year. The District identified the teachers that should have been charged to the grant and replaced the costs for the fiscal year. These teachers were approved as being allowable under the grant.

Cause: The District did not follow their policy surrounding time and effort certifications and review of allowable teachers charged to the grant.

Effect: We noted an instance of noncompliance with their time and effort policy as well as their procedures surrounding review of teachers charged to the grant. The District did not identify unallowable teachers until after year end and completed the required time and effort certifications for the final population of allowable teacher personnel costs after the year ended.

Repeat Finding: No.

Recommendation: We recommend the District review their controls and procedures surrounding time and effort certifications and reviewing individuals charged to the grant to ensure allowability under the grant.

Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.