grantcheck

Colorado · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

CITY OF ALAMOSA

ALAMOSA, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 material weakness. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 8 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each824
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score8100

Federal funding, FY2025

$1,568,405 in federal awards spent, across 7 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$950,000
Department of Transportation$211,097
Department of the Treasury$171,620

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-12-GSAFAC-0000424719
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
July 27, 2026
Federal spending
$1,568,405 · 7 programs
Major programs
1
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2025-002

material weakness

Program
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII (14.228)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2025-002: Community Development Block Grants/ State’s Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii Assistance Listing No. 14.228 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Grant No.: Not applicable Type of finding: Internal Control (material weakness) and Compliance (material noncompliance) Criteria: Contract provisions and Davis-Bacon labor standards under 29 CFR Part 5 require the contractor performing covered work to submit weekly certified payrolls and signed statements of compliance for each week in which contract work is performed. Condition: The City did not obtain the required weekly certified payrolls from the contractor for work subject to Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements. Cause: The City does not have a complete system of internal controls to ensure that contractors subject to DavisBacon wage rate requirements submit weekly certified payrolls for each week that contract work was performed. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The City is not in compliance with the provisions of 29 CFR Part 5 wage rate requirements. Without the required certified payrolls, the City cannot demonstrate that wage classifications, wage rates, and fringe benefits were reviewed for compliance prior to payment. Recommendation: The City should establish and implement formal policies and procedures requiring weekly certified payrolls be obtained and reviewed against the applicable Davis-Bacon wage requirement before contractor payment. The review should be documented and include evidence of comparison of labor classifications, wage rates, fringe benefits, and reviewer approval. Grantee’s Response: See corrective action plan

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-12-GSAFAC-0000375894
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
July 24, 2025
Federal spending
$4,441,078 · 9 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-12-GSAFAC-0000050426
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
August 9, 2024
Federal spending
$1,841,623 · 8 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.