grantcheck

Texas · Local government · $10M-$50M in federal spending

CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency, 1 with questioned costs. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 10 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars715
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score10100

Federal funding, FY2025

$42,174,574 in federal awards spent, across 38 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of the Treasury$15,773,793
Department of Housing and Urban Development$13,070,096
Department of Transportation$3,983,551

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-09-GSAFAC-0000411939
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
April 14, 2026
Federal spending
$42,174,574 · 38 programs
Major programs
2
Questioned costs
$249,565 known
Score
10 of 100

Finding 2025-002

significant deficiencyquestioned costsother matters

Program
CDBG - ENTITLEMENT GRANTS CLUSTER (14.218)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
Questioned costs
$249,565 (known)
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2025-002 Information on Federal Program: Federal Program: CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Assistance Listing: 14.218 Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance (Questioned Costs over $25,000 for a Non-Major Federal Program) Criteria 24 CFR §570.205 and §570.206 allows costs incurred for planning activities, which consist of all costs of data gathering, studies, analysis, and preparation of plans and the identification of actions that will implement such plans, as well as program administrative costs related to the planning and execution of community development activities. These costs are capped at twenty (20) percent. Condition A HUD review of the City’s program year 2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and related CDBG funded activities on the CDBG Financial Summary Report showed the City expended more than twenty (20) percent in administrative and planning costs for origin years 2015, 2017, 2018 and 2020. Cause City staff did not correctly identify activities as exceeding the administrative cap under the CDBG regulations and award requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Federal funds were reimbursed for activities which has resulted in required repayment of funds from nonfederal sources. Questioned Costs $249,565 Recommendation We recommend City officials work with HUD to determine the nature of noncompliance and implement any remedial actions to ensure future administrative and planning costs are being appropriately expended under the CDBG award agreements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Action See corrective action plan

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-09-GSAFAC-0000367768
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
May 6, 2025
Federal spending
$43,828,531 · 46 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-09-GSAFAC-0000034089
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
May 16, 2024
Federal spending
$47,581,478 · 37 programs
Major programs
4
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.