grantcheck

Texas · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

CITY OF HEMPSTEAD

HEMPSTEAD, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency, 1 repeat. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 16 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each515
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12312
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding55
Score16100

Federal funding, FY2025

$1,983,264 in federal awards spent, across 4 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$1,233,217
Department of the Treasury$453,286
Department of Homeland Security$296,761

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-09-GSAFAC-0000425873
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
August 7, 2026
Federal spending
$1,983,264 · 4 programs
Major programs
1
Score
16 of 100

Finding 2025-002

significant deficiencyrepeat finding

Program
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII (14.228)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
Repeat
Chain of 2 audit years; prior finding 2024-002
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2025-002: Insufficient Documentation of Management Review of Section 3 Quarterly and Annual Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Community Development Block Grant Mitigation Program Citywide Drainage Improvements (Assistance Listing 14.228) Compliance Requirement: Reporting and Special Tests and Provisions – Section 3 Requirements Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) § 200.303, the City must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance of compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.328 requires the City to ensure that reports submitted to the pass-through entity are accurate, complete, and supported by adequate review and oversight. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Section 3 regulations at 24 CFR Part 75 require recipients to prepare and submit quarterly and cumulative annual Section 3 reports documenting efforts to provide employment, training, and contracting opportunities to low- and moderate-income persons and businesses within the project area. Condition: The City’s grant administrator is responsible for preparing and submitting the required quarterly and annual Section 3 reports to the Texas General Land Office on behalf of the City. However, there is no documentation demonstrating that City management reviews or approves these reports prior to and after submission. Cause: The City has not established procedures requiring City management to review and document approval of the Section 3 reports prepared and submitted to the Texas General Land Office. Effect: Without documentation of City management review and approval of the Section 3 reports prepared and submitted by the grant administrator, there is an increased risk that reports submitted to the passthrough entity may be inaccurate, incomplete, or not fully compliant with federal reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: None noted. Repeat Finding: This finding is related to the prior year finding 2024-002. Recommendation: The City should strengthen internal controls over federal reporting by establishing and documenting procedures to ensure City management reviews and approves all Section 3 reports prepared and submitted by the grant administrator. Evidence of this review, such as sign-offs or approval correspondence, should be retained in the grant files to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance and HUD Section 3 reporting requirements. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the recommendation. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for additional details.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-09-GSAFAC-0000387544
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
November 25, 2025; submitted 148 days after its due date (June 30, 2025)
Federal spending
$8,386,962 · 3 programs
Major programs
2
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2024-002

significant deficiency

Program
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII (14.228)
Compliance requirement
Reporting; Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2024-002: Insufficient Documentation of Management Review of Section 3 Quarterly and Annual Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Community Development Block Grant Mitigation Program Citywide Drainage Improvements (Assistance Listing 14.228) Compliance Requirement: Reporting and Special Tests and Provisions – Section 3 Requirements Criteria: In accordance with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) § 200.303, the City must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance of compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.328 requires the City to ensure that reports submitted to the pass-through entity are accurate, complete, and supported by adequate review and oversight. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Section 3 regulations at 24 CFR Part 75 require recipients to prepare and submit quarterly and cumulative annual Section 3 reports documenting efforts to provide employment, training, and contracting opportunities to low- and moderate-income persons and businesses within the project area. Condition: The City’s grant administrator is responsible for preparing and submitting the required quarterly and annual Section 3 reports to the Texas General Land Office on behalf of the City. However, there is no documentation demonstrating that City management reviews or approves these reports prior to and after submission. Cause: The City has not established procedures requiring City management to review and document approval of the Section 3 reports prepared and submitted to the Texas General Land Office. Effect: Without documentation of City management review and approval of the Section 3 reports prepared and submitted by the grant administrator, there is an increased risk that reports submitted to the passthrough entity may be inaccurate, incomplete, or not fully compliant with federal reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: The City should strengthen internal controls over federal reporting by establishing and documenting procedures to ensure City management reviews and approves all Section 3 reports prepared and submitted by the grant administrator. Evidence of this review, such as sign-offs or approval correspondence, should be retained in the grant files to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance and HUD Section 3 reporting requirements. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the recommendation. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for additional details.