grantcheck

Texas · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

CITY OF ROSE CITY, TEXAS

VIDOR, TX

The FY2024 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency.

Score: 3 of 100 (FY2024 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score3100

Federal funding, FY2024

$818,652 in federal awards spent, across 2 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$699,910
Department of the Treasury$118,742

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-09-GSAFAC-0000400293
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
January 30, 2026; submitted 214 days after its due date (June 30, 2025)
Federal spending
$818,652 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2024-002

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII (14.228); CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

2024-002 Compliance – Control Activities - Reporting Criteria: OMB’s Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.512(a) requires a Data Collection form to be filed the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the Single Audit Report of nine months after year-end for those entities expending more than $750,000 of federal funds. Condition: The City of Rose City, Texas did not file the required Data Collection form within the required time period. Cause: Due to catastrophic damage to City services, including infrastructure, caused by back-to-back year Hurricanes, the City of Rose City, Texas was unable to submit the Data Collection form timely and was not in compliance with reporting requirements. Effect: The noncompliance with compliance attributes required under the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 may affect the City of Rose City, Texas’s current grant contracts and the opportunity to qualify for future grants. Recommendation: The City of Rose City, Texas’s governance should adopt and management should implement internal controls over oversight, monitoring and reporting to ensure compliance requirements as per OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.