Texas · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending
Community Health Service Agency, Inc.
Greenville, TX
The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.
Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)
The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.
| Part | Rule | Points | Max |
|---|
| Material weaknesses | 8 points each | 0 | 24 |
| Significant deficiencies | 3 points each | 0 | 9 |
| Repeat findings | 5 points each | 0 | 15 |
| Longest repeat chain | 2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Modified major-program opinions | qualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Questioned costs | known amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars | 0 | 15 |
| Going concern | auditor included a going-concern paragraph | 0 | 5 |
| Prior-year lateness | prior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding | 0 | 5 |
| Score | | 0 | 100 |
Federal funding, FY2025
$4,498,567 in federal awards spent, across 4 programs. Largest funding agencies:
| Agency | Spent |
|---|
| Department of Health and Human Services | $4,498,567 |
FY2025 audit
- FAC record
- 2025-01-GSAFAC-0000383284
- Fiscal year end
- January 31, 2025
- Accepted by FAC
- October 1, 2025
- Federal spending
- $4,498,567 · 4 programs
- Major programs
- 2
- Score
- 0 of 100
No findings reported.
FY2024 audit
- FAC record
- 2024-01-GSAFAC-0000063518
- Fiscal year end
- January 31, 2024
- Accepted by FAC
- October 30, 2024
- Federal spending
- $5,973,423 · 6 programs
- Major programs
- 1
- Score
- 0 of 100
No findings reported.
FY2023 audit
- FAC record
- 2023-01-GSAFAC-0000003363
- Fiscal year end
- January 31, 2023
- Accepted by FAC
- October 23, 2023
- Federal spending
- $8,410,684 · 6 programs
- Major programs
- 1
- Score
- 5 of 100
Finding 2023-001
other findings
- Program
- HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224)
- Compliance requirement
- Special tests and provisions
- FAC record
- FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing
Criteria: The Health Center Cluster requires the Organization to perform a financial assessment on consumers in order to place them on a sliding fee scale. The sliding fee scale must be based on the current Federal Poverty Guidelines at the time of assessment. Condition: Consumers are not always placed correctly on the sliding fee scale based on their household size and income level. Questioned Costs: None Context: We tested 25 consumer files for proper placement on the sliding fee scale. During this test we found 1 consumer file where the consumer was incorrectly placed on sliding fee scale D. The consumer should have been placed on sliding fee scale E (100% self-pay). Effect: Consumers may not be appropriately placed on the sliding fee scale. Cause: The Organization's controls over placement of consumers on the sliding fee scale necessary for financial assessment of consumers are not operating effectively. Recommendation: The Organization should review procedures and training regarding the sliding fee scale calculation and placement.