grantcheck

Texas · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending

Compass Rose Education, Inc.

San Antonio, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 material weakness. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 13 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each824
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph55
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score13100

Federal funding, FY2025

$5,913,379 in federal awards spent, across 8 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Agriculture$3,167,244
Department of Education$2,746,135

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-08-GSAFAC-0000402763
Fiscal year end
August 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
February 18, 2026
Federal spending
$5,913,379 · 8 programs
Major programs
1
Going concern
The auditor included a going-concern paragraph.
Score
13 of 100

Finding 2025-001

material weakness

Program
TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (84.010)
Compliance requirement
Eligibility
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Federal Program: Title I Part A ALN 84.010A Finding Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Local educational agencies are required to allocate Title I, Part A funds to schools based on rank- and-serve criteria using poverty data. Schools with poverty rates above 75 percent must be served first, and allocation decisions must be driven by relative poverty levels, including when grade spans are utilized. Local educational agencies are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition and Context: The School did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure Title I allocations were developed and approved using a compliant rank-and-serve methodology. Adjustments were required to the allocations that were not detected and corrected timely by the School’s internal controls. Cause: Turnover in personnel led to gaps in responsibilities. Effect or Potential Effect: The School was at risk of not detecting and correcting noncompliance in allocating Title I Part A funds by campus in a timely fashion. Questioned Cost: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend the School develop, document, and implement a Title I allocation methodology that complies with ESSA rank-and-serve requirements, including clear procedures for applying poverty data and grade spans. Management should ensure allocations are reviewed and approved prior to implementation. Views of Responsible Official: The School will develop and formally document a Title I allocation methodology that complies with ESSA rank-and-serve requirements. The methodology will include clear procedures for ranking campuses by poverty, applying grade-span groupings where applicable, and ensuring that campuses with poverty rates above 75 percent are fully served prior to allocating funds to lower-poverty campuses. Management will implement a review and approval process for Title I allocations prior to the start of each fiscal year, including review by program and finance leadership.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-08-GSAFAC-0000351112
Fiscal year end
August 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
January 17, 2025
Federal spending
$7,473,080 · 8 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-08-GSAFAC-0000018854
Fiscal year end
August 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
January 19, 2024
Federal spending
$10,118,975 · 8 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.