grantcheck

Texas · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

CROCKETT COUNTY CONSOLIDATED COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT

OZONA, TX

The FY2024 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024.

No FY2025 single audit on file as of October 30, 2026. For the fiscal year ending August 31, 2025, it was due May 31, 2026, 152 days earlier. It is expected because the FY2024 audit reported $842,699 in federal spending; an organization whose federal spending fell below the threshold would not need one.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2024 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2024

$842,699 in federal awards spent, across 6 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$565,601
Department of Agriculture$277,098

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-08-GSAFAC-0000065072
Fiscal year end
August 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
January 28, 2025
Federal spending
$842,699 · 6 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-08-GSAFAC-0000007253
Fiscal year end
August 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
January 23, 2024
Federal spending
$1,056,772 · 7 programs
Major programs
1
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2023-002

material weakness

Program
EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND (84.425)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria:

Government Auditing Standards require proper internal control over financial reporting for governmental entities. In an effective control environment the District’s general ledger should be reviewed at least monthly to determine that all funds are complete and in balance, all bank accounts are reconciled, all transactions are properly recorded and supported by documentation, all accounts and related transactions are reasonable as to amount and balance status and all expenditures are within the budget.

Condition:

The District’s books were not maintained and reviewed on a timely basis. The books contained numerous errors, transactions not properly recorded, accounts with incorrect balances and expenditures exceeding the budget.

Cause:

The District’s personnel were not performing their duties of maintaining the District’s financial records to ensure accuracy and completeness, and a lack of proper oversight by management contributed to this failure.

Effect:

The general ledger contained numerous errors and did not accurately reflect the District’s finances. Internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

Auditor’s Recommendation:

The general ledger should be reviewed for completeness and accuracy, bank accounts should be reconciled, expenditures should be monitored to assure that they are within the budget and any necessary corrections should be made in a timely manner.

Management's Response:

The District will implement procedures to ensure that the District’s personnel review the general ledger, that bank accounts are reconciled, that expenditures are compared the budget and that adjustments are made as needed. Additional staff or outside assistance will be engaged as needed.