grantcheck

Colorado · Nonprofit · under $2M in federal spending

Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

Denver, CO

The FY2023 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency.

No FY2024 single audit on file as of October 30, 2026. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, it was due September 30, 2025, 395 days earlier. It is expected because the FY2023 audit reported $878,990 in federal spending; an organization whose federal spending fell below the threshold would not need one.

Score: 8 of 100 (FY2023 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding55
Score8100

Federal funding, FY2023

$878,990 in federal awards spent, across 3 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of the Interior$338,503
National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities$258,637
Department of Agriculture$186,107

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-12-GSAFAC-0000042170
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
June 7, 2024
Federal spending
$878,990 · 3 programs
Major programs
1
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (15.245, 45.301, 47.047, 47.074)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or specific requirement: Part 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Sections 200.317 through 200.326 describe specific federal requirements related to procurement actions and documented procurement policies for federal award recipients. These standards require various elements, such as addressing conflicts of interests, avoiding acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement, and conducting procurement in a manner that provides full and open competition, and adherence to the required methods of procurement for the acquisition of property and services. These Uniform Guidance standards have been updated several times in the past few years.

Part 2 CFR, Section 180.300 describes federal requirements related to suspension and debarment for federal award recipients. The standards require that a federal award recipient verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended and debarred. Procedures for satisfying such requirements should be documented, and evidence of such procedures should be maintained.

Condition: The Organization’s procurement policy does not address all federally required elements of procurement policies under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.326. Specifically, some of the items absent from the Organization’s procurement policy include: certain federally defined methods of procurement, open-competition clauses, and clauses related to acquisition of unnecessary and duplicative items.

The Organization also does not have a written policy that specifies its suspension and debarment procedures. As a result, the Organization was not able to provide evidence that it verified a vendor with which it entered into a cover transaction was not suspended and debarred before the date it entered into the transaction with such vendor. During our audit procedures, we noted that the vendor was not suspended and debarred.

Questioned costs: None

Context: Based on our review of the Organization's procurement policy, we noted that several federally required elements were absent from the policy.

We also noted that the Organization did not have a documented suspension and debarment policy, and as a result the Organization was not able to provide evidence that it verified a vendor with which it entered into a cover transaction was not suspended and debarred before the date it entered into the transaction with such vendor.

Cause: The Organization’s procurement policy has not been revised to address all federally required elements specified in the Uniform Guidance. The Organization also does not have a documented suspension and debarment policy.

Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements related to a documented procurement policy, and documented suspension and debarment procedures.

Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.

Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update its procurement policy to include all federally required elements of such policies for federal award recipients under the Uniform Guidance. We also recommend that the Organization document and maintain evidence of its suspension and debarment procedures to be in compliance with requirements specified in the Uniform Guidance.

Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.