grantcheck

Texas · Nonprofit · under $2M in federal spending

Economic Mobility Systems

Dallas, TX

The FY2024 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024.

No FY2025 single audit on file as of October 30, 2026. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, it was due March 31, 2026, 213 days earlier. It is expected because the FY2024 audit reported $1,185,727 in federal spending; an organization whose federal spending fell below the threshold would not need one.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2024 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2024

$1,185,727 in federal awards spent, across 1 program. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$1,185,727

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000356709
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
March 26, 2025
Federal spending
$1,185,727 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000023172
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
February 14, 2024
Federal spending
$894,681 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiency

Program
EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND (84.425)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding No. 2023‐001: Allowable Costs – Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Organization is required to comply with allowable cost principles as detailed in 2 CFR 200, Support E. Condition: During allowable costs testing it was noted that 2 out of 22 sampled expenses contained unallowable costs. Cause: The Organization’s programmatic employees were not aware of the details of 2 CFR 200, Subpart E, which resulted in unallowable costs being included on expense reimbursements. Effect: Unallowable costs were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: The Organization should implement controls over allowable costs that ensures unallowable costs are detected and appropriately omitted from grant reimbursement requests. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan.