grantcheck

Texas · Local government · $10M-$50M in federal spending

EDCOUCH - ELSA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

EDCOUCH, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 with questioned costs. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$14,342,910 in federal awards spent, across 16 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$8,761,541
Department of Agriculture$5,292,728
Department of Health and Human Services$220,703

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000418363
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
May 21, 2026
Federal spending
$14,342,910 · 16 programs
Major programs
2
Questioned costs
$1,593 known
Score
0 of 100

Finding 2025-003

questioned costsother matters

Program
EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND (84.425)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
Questioned costs
$1,593 (known)
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2025-003 Duplicate expenditures charged to same grant Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund – ESSER III ALN 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Year: 2021 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.403 (Factors affecting allowability of costs), costs charged to federal awards must be:  Necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award;  Allocable to the award;  Consistent with policies and procedures applied uniformly to both federally financed and other activities;  Adequately documented; and  Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in the Uniform Guidance or the terms of the award. Condition: During our testing of expenditures charged to ESSER III, we identified costs that were not allowable under the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Specifically, payroll expenditures were charged twice to the grant for one payroll period. Cause and Effect: The condition appears to be the result of inadequate review procedures over expenditures charged to the federal program. Without proper internal controls, the District cannot prevent duplicate expenditures from being charged to a grant. Failure to properly review expenditures charged can result in noncompliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: The identified cost of $1,593 is less than 5 percent of the total program expenditures of $1,269,440. This is not considered a material noncompliance instance. Recommendation: We recommend the District establish and maintain proper review procedures for expenditures charged to grants prior to submission for reimbursement. Management’s views: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 95.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000066423
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
November 22, 2024
Federal spending
$11,802,367 · 15 programs
Major programs
3
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000010577
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
December 8, 2023
Federal spending
$35,449,480 · 14 programs
Major programs
4
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.