grantcheck

Arizona · Nonprofit · under $2M in federal spending

Esperanza En Escalante

Tucson, AZ

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$1,160,951 in federal awards spent, across 1 program. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Veterans Affairs$1,160,951

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-09-GSAFAC-0000416451
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
April 22, 2026
Federal spending
$1,160,951 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-09-GSAFAC-0000351798
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
January 22, 2025
Federal spending
$994,690 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-09-GSAFAC-0000030036
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
March 14, 2024
Federal spending
$1,101,581 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiency

Program
VA HOMELESS PROVIDERS GRANT AND PER DIEM PROGRAM (64.024)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition: Numerous data entry errors occurred during the year where incorrect check numbers were entered into the accounting system. There were also multiple gaps in sequence in the check register. This should have been discovered during the bank reconciliation process (review of canceled check images) but was not. Bank statements were not reconciled correctly on a timely basis, and lists of outstanding checks were not included with the approved bank reconciliations. Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 200.303 requires the organization to establish and maintain effective internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the organization is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.Cause: The Organization experienced significant staff turnover during the year. Effect: Internal controls over operating cash were deficient. Bank reconciliations had to be reperformed after year-end by the new Accountant. Recommendation: Bank reconciliations should include details (list of outstanding items) and be reviewed on a monthly basis. Any gaps in check sequence, stale-dated items and other unusual items should be followed up on and investigated. Bank reconciliations should be done in a timely manner (generally within 30-45 days after month-end). Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs. See Corrective Action Plan.