grantcheck

Arizona · Local government · $10M-$50M in federal spending

Flowing Wells Unified School District No. 8

Tucson, AZ

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency, 1 with questioned costs. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 14 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars1115
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score14100

Federal funding, FY2025

$10,105,923 in federal awards spent, across 14 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$5,348,921
Department of Agriculture$4,189,640
Department of Health and Human Services$435,615

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000386942
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
January 17, 2026
Federal spending
$10,105,923 · 14 programs
Major programs
2
Questioned costs
$189,745 known
Score
14 of 100

Finding 2025-001

significant deficiencyquestioned costsother matters

Program
CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER (10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
Questioned costs
$189,745 (known)
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding Number: 2025‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Number: 7AZ300AZ3, 7AZ310AZ1 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $189,745 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria According  to  the  Memo  SP60‐2016,  Indirect  Costs  Guidance  for  State  Agencies  and  School  Food  Authorities, issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), a District may recover indirect costs of services rendered to school food service at a rate not to exceed the unrestricted indirect cost rate approved by the Arizona Department of Education (ADE). Condition Indirect Cost Guidance for the Child Nutrition Program was not followed correctly. Cause The District was unaware that payments to its food service management company exceeding $50,000 must be excluded from the indirect cost calculation. Effect Indirect costs of $189,745 were overcharged to the Child Nutrition Program. Context When calculating indirect costs, the District did not exclude specific costs prohibited in the indirect cost  calculation.  As  a  result,  the  indirect  cost  rate  was  applied  to  a  net  food  service  expenditure  amount that was greater than it should have been. Therefore, the District overcharged $189,745 to the  Child  Nutrition  Cluster  program  as  reported  in  the  Food  Service  Fund.  The  sample  was  not  intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should ensure indirect costs are calculated in accordance with the formula set forth in the guidance issued by USDA and ADE. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000066717
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
February 25, 2025
Federal spending
$14,555,186 · 13 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000031764
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
March 22, 2024
Federal spending
$14,711,661 · 14 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.