grantcheck

Colorado · Local government · $10M-$50M in federal spending

Fort Lupton, City of

FORT LUPTON, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency, 1 repeat. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 11 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each515
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12312
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score11100

Federal funding, FY2025

$19,679,981 in federal awards spent, across 3 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Agriculture$15,720,103
Environmental Protection Agency$3,356,403
Department of the Interior$603,475

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-12-GSAFAC-0000423119
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
July 7, 2026
Federal spending
$19,679,981 · 3 programs
Major programs
2
Score
11 of 100

Finding 2025-002

significant deficiencyrepeat findingother matters

Program
DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (66.468); WATER AND WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR RURAL COMMUNITIES (10.760)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
Repeat
Chain of 2 audit years; prior finding 2024-002
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Federal Program Name(s): Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listing Number(s): 66.468 and 10.760 Pass-Through Agency: Colorado Water Resource and Power Development Authority (66.468) Pass-Through Number(s): None Award Period: 1/1/2025 – 12/31/2025 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. "Covered transactions" include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: We noted that the City does have policies and procedures in place for compliance with suspension and debarment requirements; however, we noted that the vendor selected for testing had not been checked to verify they were not suspended or debarred prior to the services provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The City does have a policy and procedure to check a vendor’s suspension and debarment status either by checking the active record on SAM.gov, collecting a certification from the proposed entity, and/or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The City was not able to provide verification, prior to procurement, of the suspension and debarment status through review of SAM.gov, providing a certification from the vendor, or through a clause or condition within the signed contract. We did verify this vendor was not currently suspended or debarred through review of SAM.gov. Cause: The City did not maintain a system to adequately track and document vendors needing to be verified through SAM.gov. Effect: The City could make a payment to a vendor or subrecipient who is suspended and/or debarred from participating in federal programs. Repeat Finding: Yes

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-12-GSAFAC-0000375639
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
August 8, 2025
Federal spending
$2,644,975 · 6 programs
Major programs
1
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2024-002

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://governmentcontractregistration.com/sam-registration-and-renewal/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300).

Condition: We noted that the City does have policies and procedures in place for compliance with suspension and debarment requirements; however, we noted that the vendor selected for testing had not been checked to verify they were not suspended or debarred prior to the services provided.

Questioned Costs: None.

Context: The City does have a policy and procedure to check a vendor’s suspension and debarment status either by checking the active record on SAM.gov, collecting a certification from the proposed entity, and/or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The City was not able to provide verification, prior to procurement, of the suspension and debarment status through review of SAM.gov, providing a certification from the vendor, or through a clause or condition within the signed contract. We did verify this vendor was not currently suspended or debarred through review of SAM.gov.

Cause: The City did not verify the vendor tested was in compliance with suspension and debarment requirements prior to the services provided.

Effect: The City could make a payment to a vendor or subrecipient who is suspended and/or debarred from participating in federal programs.

Repeat Finding: No

Recommendation: The City should update all contracts to include a suspension and debarment paragraph to verify status with every renewal, request certification from the proposed entity, or verify vendor through SAM.gov prior to utilizing vendor services.

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The finance director and the public works director have already implemented a process to verify the SAM status of all contractors on all projects regardless of funding.