grantcheck

Texas · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending

GREAT HEARTS AMERICA - TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 3 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score3100

Federal funding, FY2025

$5,364,328 in federal awards spent, across 8 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$3,329,936
Department of Agriculture$2,034,392

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000404121
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
March 6, 2026
Federal spending
$5,364,328 · 8 programs
Major programs
2
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2025-002

significant deficiency

Program
SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS) (84.367)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding #2025-002 – Allowable Costs – Significant Deficiency. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Education, Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants, Assistance Listing #: 84.367A, Contract #’s: S367A230041 and S367A240041. Criteria: Same as finding #2025-001. Condition and context: Same as finding #2025-001. Cause: Same as finding #2025-001. Effect: Same as finding #2025-001. Recommendation: Same as finding #2025-001. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000068634
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
December 9, 2024
Federal spending
$4,692,309 · 7 programs
Major programs
2
Score
9 of 100

Finding 2024-003

significant deficiency

Program
CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER (10.553, 10.555); SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) (84.027)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding #2024-003 – Allowable Costs - Significant Deficiency. Applicable federal programs: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Passed through Texas Department of Agriculture: School Breakfast Program, AL#10.553, Contract #’s: 202423N109946 and 202120N19946, National School Lunch Program, AL#10.555, Contract #’s: 202423N109946 and 202222N109946, U. S. Department of Education, Passed through Texas Education Agency: Special Education Grants to States, AL#84.027A, Contract #: H027A230008. Criteria: Same as finding #2024-001. Condition and context: Same as finding #2024-001. The invoice was charged to the Foundation School Program. Cause: Same as finding #2024-001. Questioned costs: $0. Effect: Failure to have an effective system of internal control over non-payroll disbursements resulted in an unauthorized payment and could result in overbilling grant programs. Recommendation: Same as finding #2024-001. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Finding 2024-004

significant deficiency

Program
CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER (10.553, 10.555); SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) (84.027)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding #2024-004 – Reporting - Significant Deficiency. Applicable federal programs: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Passed through Texas Department of Agriculture: School Breakfast Program, AL#10.553, Contract #’s: 202423N109946 and 202120N19946, National School Lunch Program, AL#10.555, Contract #’s: 202423N109946 and 202222N109946, U. S. Department of Education, Passed through Texas Education Agency: Special Education Grants to States, AL#84.027A, Contract #: H027A230008. Criteria: Same as finding #2024-002. Condition and context: Same as finding #2024-002. Repeat of finding #2023-001. Cause: Same as finding #2024-002. Effect: Failure to have an effective system of internal control over financial reporting may result in inaccurate billings to federal programs. Recommendation: Same as finding #2024-002. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Finding 2024-005

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER (10.553, 10.555); EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND (84.425); ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STATE GRANTS (84.365); SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) (84.027); STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT PROGRAM (84.424); SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS) (84.367); TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (84.010)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding #2024-005 – Reporting – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal programs: All programs. Criteria: Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards – In accordance with the Uniform Guidance §200.508 and §200.510, management is to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal wards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition and context: The School did not include the Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program on the SEFA for fiscal year 2024 and had not performed a reconciliation of federal expenditures to federal program revenue. In our testing of the review and approval of the federal grant billings for the Child Nutrition Cluster and the Special Education Cluster there was no evidence of review and approval of the request for payment from a person independent of the preparation process and as a result of the failure to reconcile revenue to expenses an overbilling of the Special Education Cluster of approximately $19,000 was identified. The School has mitigating controls through a formalized review of the budget to actual for the month and year-to-date by campus and major departments. Significant variances are investigated by the Financial Analyst and the Headmasters or Department Heads. Cause: The School failed to have procedures in place to identify and reflect all federal grants on the SEFA, have timely procedures to reconcile the federal expenditures to the federal program revenue, and have an independent review of grant billing. Effect: A federal program with approximately $55,000 of expenditures was omitted from the SEFA and the revenue for the Special Education Cluster was overstated by approximately $19,000. Recommendation: Develop policies and procedures to identify and reflect all federal programs on the SEFA, reconcile the federal expenditures to the federal program revenue on a routine basis, and formalize the independent review process for the SEFA and grant billings. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Finding 2024-006

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) (84.027)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding #2024-006 – Allowable Costs – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Education, Passed through Texas Education Agency: Special Education Grants to States, AL#84.027A, Contract #: H027A230008. Criteria: In accordance with the Compliance Supplement a local education agency can only use federal funds under IDEA, Part B for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities. Condition and context: During our testing of 40 disbursements totaling $83,514, 1 disbursement of $551.34 for reading books not specific to special education was erroneously charged to the program. Cause: The employee responsible for coding did not follow the allowable costs guidance for the program. Effect: An unallowable cost was charged to the program. Recommendation: Provide additional training to employees on coding and the determination of allowable costs. Views of responsible officials and

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000027342
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
March 18, 2024
Federal spending
$5,686,172 · 6 programs
Major programs
2
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2023-002

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (84.010)
Compliance requirement
Other
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding #2023-002 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Education, Passed through Texas Education Agency, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies, Assistance Listing # 84.010, Contract Number: S010A220043 and S010A210043. Criteria: In accordance with the Texas Administrative Code Title 19, Part 2, Chapter 100, Subchapter AA, Division 6, Rule 100.1212, special education teachers must be certified in the fields that they are assigned to teach as required by state and/or federal law. Great Hearts America – Texas should maintain the certification documentation of teachers charged to the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies programs to evidence compliance with this standard. Condition and context: During our testing of documentation of teacher certificates for the 17 people charged to the program, a copy of teacher certificates for 4 teachers was not available for review. Cause: Great Hearts America – Texas did not follow its policies and procedures for retention of documentary evidence of teacher certification. Effect: Failure to adequately establish and maintain effective internal controls over the retention of teacher certificates could result in noncompliance. Recommendation: Reemphasize the need to adhere with policies and procedures to ensure retention of documentary evidence of teacher certifications. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.