grantcheck

Colorado · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending

Greeley Area Habitat for Humanity

Greeley, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$2,153,030 in federal awards spent, across 3 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$1,130,237
Department of the Treasury$1,022,793

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000408388
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
March 16, 2026
Federal spending
$2,153,030 · 3 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000358100
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
March 7, 2025
Federal spending
$3,246,379 · 2 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

Finding 2024-001

other matters

Program
CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027); ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE, COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING, AND MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS (14.251)
Compliance requirement
Subrecipient monitoring
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria: Suspension and Debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties who are suspended or debarred from federal awards. For certain covered transactions over $25,000, the program must verify that an entity is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), alternative certification or contract language. Condition: One vendor paid $2,256,379 in program 14.251 and $990,000 in program 21.027 for a total of $3,246,379 was verified using the System for Award Management (SAM) but support was not retained by management. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as there may be no debarred vendors. Context: Vendors on this project were paid enough federal funds to require the program to verify that the provider is not suspended or debarred. Effect: Amounts may be paid to parties not eligible to receive federal funding. Cause: This purchase was for contract services and Habitat thought that the request for proposal and bid documentation included this language and that the SAM system was checked. Recommendation: We recommend management check the System for Award Management (SAM) or include contract language to ensure federal funds are not paid to suspended or debarred parties. Management’s Response: Agree Contact Person: Cheri Witt-Brown, CEO