grantcheck

Texas · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

HALE COUNTY, TEXAS

PLAINVIEW, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$1,018,396 in federal awards spent, across 1 program. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of the Treasury$1,018,396

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-12-GSAFAC-0000424859
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
July 27, 2026
Federal spending
$1,018,396 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-12-GSAFAC-0000373431
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
July 22, 2025
Federal spending
$4,259,410 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
11 of 100

Finding 2024-002

significant deficiencyrepeat finding

Program
CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
Repeat
Chain of 2 audit years; prior finding 2023-002
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2024-002: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The County’s reports submitted to the Department of Treasury were not reviewed and approved by a separate individual outside of the preparer. Cause: The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure a secondary review and approval of the reports submitted to the Department of Treasury were performed by someone other than the preparer of the report. Effect: Without a secondary review and approval, there is a possibility that the report may not be accurately completed. Questioned Costs: None. Context / Sampling: For the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, only one annual report was required to be filed. We tested the one annual report filed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a control process which includes a secondary review and approval of the required reports to be submitted to the federal agency. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the noted finding. Refer to Corrective Action Plan.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-12-GSAFAC-0000051979
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
August 22, 2024
Federal spending
$898,572 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
6 of 100

Finding 2023-002

significant deficiency

Program
CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2023-002: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The County’s reports submitted to the Department of Treasury were not reviewed and approved by a separate individual outside of the preparer. Cause: The County did not have an internal control process in place to ensure a secondary review and approval of the reports submitted to the Department of Treasury were performed by someone other than the preparer of the report. Effect: Without a secondary review and approval, there is a possibility that the report may not be accurately completed. Questioned Costs: None. Context / Sampling: For the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, only one annual report was required to be filed. We tested the one annual report filed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the County implement a control process which includes a secondary review and approval of the required reports to be submitted to the federal agency. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the noted finding. Refer to Corrective Action Plan.

Finding 2023-003

significant deficiency

Program
CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2023-003: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Procurement Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Per 31 CFR 19.300, prior to enter in subawards and contracts with award funds, recipients must verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 31 CFR § 19.300. Condition: The County did not review one vendor to determine that it was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into a transaction with them. Cause: Adequate controls are not in place to require verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering into a contract. Effect: The County could enter into a contract with a suspended or debarred vendor. Questioned Costs: None Context / Sampling: We tested 9 of 28 transactions subject to suspension and debarment in the SLFRF program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The County should review all vendors for suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the noted finding. Refer to Corrective Action Plan.