grantcheck

Colorado · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending

HIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER

LAMAR, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 material weakness. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 16 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each824
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15815
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score16100

Federal funding, FY2025

$4,146,191 in federal awards spent, across 4 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Health and Human Services$4,146,191

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-12-GSAFAC-0000419555
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
June 4, 2026
Federal spending
$4,146,191 · 4 programs
Major programs
1; qualified opinion on 1
Score
16 of 100

Finding 2025-003

material weaknessmodified opinion

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant AL Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Award Period: 1/1/25 - 12/31/25 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance

Criteria or Specific Requirement Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”

Condition and Context During our testing of 40 sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified three visits where the sliding fee discount provided did not agree with the discount that should have been received per the application due to clerical error.

Effect Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.

Questioned Costs None identified.

Cause Clerical error in which the incorrect sliding fee rate was selected and applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.

Recommendation We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.

Views of Responsible Officials We have found that our electronic medical record (eCW) is automatically classifying the federal poverty level (FPL) for all patients no matter if we have their insurance or household income inputted into the system. This has led to some inaccuracies in the rating of their FPL in eCW. We are actively manually overriding this setting, so we will have full control when to run the FPL after patient information is collected.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-12-GSAFAC-0000378455
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
August 21, 2025
Federal spending
$2,090,224 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-12-GSAFAC-0000044743
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
September 4, 2024
Federal spending
$2,354,912 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.