grantcheck

Colorado · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF STERLING, COLORADO

Sterling, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency, 1 repeat. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 19 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each515
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12612
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding55
Score19100

Federal funding, FY2025

$970,919 in federal awards spent, across 3 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$970,919

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-03-GSAFAC-0000400716
Fiscal year end
March 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
February 4, 2026
Federal spending
$970,919 · 3 programs
Major programs
2
Score
19 of 100

Finding 2025-001

significant deficiencyrepeat finding

Program
PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND (14.872); SECTION 8 PROJECT-BASED CLUSTER (14.195)
Compliance requirement
Cash management
Repeat
Chain of at least 3 audit years; prior finding 2024-001
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition During our audit, we noted that the Authority has not yet implemented formal procedures for monitoring and investing available cash balances. Substantial funds continue to be maintained in non-interest-bearing accounts. Total cash and investment balances at year-end amounted to approximately $2,494,505, consisting of $2,367,938 held in bank deposits and $126,267 in investments. Of this total, $379,415 represented restricted cash not available for investment, leaving approximately $1.99 million in unrestricted cash balances held primarily in bank deposits. In addition, the Authority had an operating subsidy receivable of $331,592 at year-end, indicating that a significant portion of available HUD funds had not yet been drawn. The Authority made only two operating-subsidy drawdowns during the year rather than performing monthly draws as required by HUD. Criteria Governmental entities should ensure that available cash balances are prudently invested in accordance with approved policies and applicable regulations to maximize earnings while maintaining safety and liquidity. Operating subsidies should also be drawn down as expenses are incurred to comply with HUD cash-management requirements. Effect Maintaining significant cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts results in lost investment opportunities and reduced interest income. Infrequent drawdowns may also result in inefficient cash-flow management and noncompliance with HUD requirements for timely use of program funds. During the fiscal year, the Authority earned total interest income of approximately $13,326, of which approximately $5,937 was derived from investments yielding an average rate of return of approximately 4.82 percent, based on average investment balances. To estimate the potential earnings had available funds been properly invested, we assumed that approximately $1.99 million of unrestricted cash balances, less $200,000 retained in checking accounts for operating needs ($100,000 for Public Housing and $100,000 for MacLaren), were invested in an account earning a comparable 4.82 percent rate of return. Based on this assumption, projected interest income would have been approximately $86,300, representing an increase of about $73,000 over actual earnings. Even under a conservative 3 percent rate of return, projected interest income would have been approximately $53,700, or about $40,400 higher than actual earnings. This analysis demonstrates the continued opportunity cost associated with maintaining large cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts. Cause The Authority did not have effective cash management and investment procedures in place. Recommendation The Authority should establish separate cash management and investment procedures. The Authority should advance funds as they are obligated from HUD, which would generally require operating subsidy being advanced on a monthly basis.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2025-03-GSAFAC-0000388417
Fiscal year end
March 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
February 4, 2026; submitted 400 days after its due date (December 31, 2024)
Federal spending
$1,076,301 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Score
11 of 100

Finding 2024-001

significant deficiencyrepeat finding

Program
OTHER CLUSTER NOT LISTED ABOVE (14.850, 14.872)
Compliance requirement
Cash management
Repeat
Chain of at least 2 audit years; prior finding 2023-001
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition During our audit, we noted that the Authority has not yet implemented formal procedures for monitoring and investing available cash balances. Substantial funds continue to be maintained in non-interestbearing accounts. Total cash and investment balances at year-end amounted to approximately $2,554,904, consisting of $2,434,274 held in bank deposits and $120,330 in investments. Of this total, $361,135 represented restricted cash not available for investment, leaving approximately $2.07 million in unrestricted cash balances held primarily in bank deposits. In addition, the Authority had an operating subsidy receivable of $149,309 at year-end, indicating that a significant portion of available HUD funds had not yet been drawn. The Authority made only two operating-subsidy drawdowns during the year rather than performing monthly draws as required by HUD. Criteria Governmental entities should ensure that available cash balances are prudently invested in accordance with approved policies and applicable regulations to maximize earnings while maintaining safety and liquidity. Operating subsidies should also be drawn down as expenses are incurred to comply with HUD cash-management requirements. Effect Maintaining significant cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts results in lost investment opportunities and reduced interest income. Infrequent drawdowns may also result in inefficient cashflow management and noncompliance with HUD requirements for timely use of program funds. The Authority earned total interest income of approximately $18,472 during the fiscal year, of which $5,982.69 was from investments yielding an average rate of return of about 5.10 percent. To estimate the potential earnings had available funds been properly invested, we assumed that unrestricted cash balances, less $200,000 retained in checking accounts for operating needs ($100,000 for Public Housing and $100,000 for MacLaren), were invested in an account earning a similar 5.10 percent return. Based on this assumption, projected interest income would have been approximately $93,665, an increase of about $75,000 over actual earnings. Even under a conservative 3 percent rate of return, projected interest income would be about $55,000, or nearly $36,000 higher. This analysis demonstrates the continued opportunity cost of maintaining large balances in non-interest-bearing accounts. Cause The Authority did not have effective cash management and investment procedures in place. Recommendation The Authority should establish separate cash management and investment procedures. The Authority should advance funds as they are obligated from HUD, which would generally require operating subsidy being advanced on a monthly basis.