grantcheck

Colorado · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

Housing Authority of the City of Walsenburg

Walsenburg, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 material weakness.

Score: 8 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each824
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score8100

Federal funding, FY2025

$1,317,987 in federal awards spent, across 2 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$1,317,987

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-03-GSAFAC-0000394776
Fiscal year end
March 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
December 23, 2025
Federal spending
$1,317,987 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2025-001

material weakness

Program
PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND (14.872)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

2025 – 001: Period of Performance

Federal Program CFDA # 14.872 Capital Fund Program

Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance

Condition: Management of a financial reporting entity is required to establish and maintain internal controls over compliance to ensure that they are compliant with all requirements of Federal programs. The Authority did not obligate sufficient amounts of expenditures within the allotted time frame for one capital fund program out of five programs tested.

Criteria or specific requirement: Unless an extension is approved by HUD, a PHA must obligate at least 90 percent of each Capital Fund grant, including formula grants, non-accumulating RHF, natural disaster, and lead-based paint grants within 24 months of the funds becoming available to the PHA for obligation.

Effect: In one instance out of five capital fund programs tested the PHA did not obligate 90% of the capital funds within the period of performance.

Cause: There were miscommunications and misunderstanding between HUD and the PHA regarding the requirements for extending deadlines and obligations related to COVID-19 consequences, including impacts on supply chains and staffing capacity. Additionally, there was confusion concerning the applicable guidelines for small, rural, high-performing PHAs. This misunderstanding affected the interpretation and implementation of certain requirements and timelines.

Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.

Recommendation: It is recommended the Authority review all of the policies in place relating to the obligation of capital programs to ensure that funding is properly obligated and expended within the required time frame.

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.