grantcheck

Texas · Higher education · $10M-$50M in federal spending

LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

Lubbock, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 3 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score3100

Federal funding, FY2025

$12,864,148 in federal awards spent, across 1 program. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$12,864,148

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000401182
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
February 5, 2026
Federal spending
$12,864,148 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2025-001

significant deficiency

Program
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2025-001 Required Disclosures Major program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Type of finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance Questioned cost: $0 Criteria Per 34 CFR §668.164 and related federal disclosure requirements for Tier One arrangements, institutions must publicly disclose the following within 60 days after the end of the award year:  A copy of the contract with the third-party servicer providing banking services for Title IV funds;  The total consideration paid or received under the contract for the year;  The number of students who had financial accounts under the contract; and  The mean and median of actual costs incurred by account holders. Additionally, institutions must submit required banking services information to the U.S. Department of Education. Condition The University did not comply with several aspects of these disclosure requirements. Specifically, the contract and related data were not posted publicly on the University’s website, and there was no evidence of submission of required information to the Department of Education. Cause The University entered into the banking services contract during the fiscal year and was unaware of the associated disclosure requirements. Effect Required disclosures were not made timely, limiting transparency for students and other stakeholders and resulting in noncompliance with federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the University implement formal processes and internal controls to:  Identify all federal disclosure requirements related to Title IV banking arrangements;  Ensure timely posting of required information on the University’s website; and  Confirm submission of required data to the Department of Education.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000069093
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
December 5, 2024
Federal spending
$12,159,723 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000003686
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
October 27, 2023
Federal spending
$12,349,898 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
22 of 100

Finding 2023-002

material weaknessrepeat finding

Program
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (84.007, 84.033, 84.063 and 2 more)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
Repeat
Chain of 4 audit years; prior finding 2022-001
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2023-002 Enrollment Reporting Major Program: Student Financial Aid Cluster Type of finding: Material Weakness and Compliance Questioned Cost: $0 Criteria 34 CFR 685.309 sets forth the criteria for administrative and fiscal control and fund accounting requirements for schools participating in the Direct Loan Program in regard to enrollment reporting requirements. Condition For 6 out of 60 students selected for testing, the University failed to report the change in the student’s enrollment status to the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”) within a timely manner. Cause The University’s reports used to identify students with changes in enrollment statuses failed to pick up students who had registration or transcript holds. Effect The errors in reporting resulted in reporting dates outside of the required reporting timeframe or other information to be reported incorrectly. Recommendation We recommend the financial aid and registrar’s offices continue to review controls over information being entered into the system for dates and other academic information that is required to be reported to ensure that status changes and other academic information are certified within the required timeframe. We also recommend that further monitoring of the system used to track status changes and reporting of those status changes be made by financial aid or the registrar’s office. Status See the Corrective Action Plan noted as the University’s response to finding 2023-002.