grantcheck

Texas · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending

Martin Luther King, Jr. Family Clinic D/B/A Foremost Family Health

Dallas, TX

The FY2024 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency, 1 with questioned costs. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024.

Score: 24 of 100 (FY2024 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars1115
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph55
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding55
Score24100

Federal funding, FY2024

$5,604,829 in federal awards spent, across 2 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Health and Human Services$5,604,829

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-11-GSAFAC-0000379887
Fiscal year end
November 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
January 20, 2026; submitted 142 days after its due date (August 31, 2025)
Federal spending
$5,604,829 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Questioned costs
$155,087 known
Going concern
The auditor included a going-concern paragraph.
Score
24 of 100

Finding 2024-001

significant deficiencyquestioned costsother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224)
Compliance requirement
Period of performance
Questioned costs
$155,087 (known)
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Health Center Program Cluster - Assistance Listing Number 93.224 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS00127-23-00, February 1, 2024 - January 31, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement - Period of Performance (45 CFR 75.309) Condition - Costs charged to the grant award were incurred prior to the start of the period of performance. Cause - The Organization’s period of performance internal controls over payroll grant expenditures consider the pay date rather than accrual-based salary and wage expense and may easily be circumvented. Effect or potential effect - The Organization charged salaries and wages incurred prior to the beginning of the period of performance Questioned costs - $155,087. Questioned costs were determined by identifying salaries and wages incurred prior to the beginning of the period of performance based on payroll periods and pay dates. Context - Salaries and wages from pay periods paid in January 2024 and the first pay period paid during the period of performance were charged to the federal award, while all or a portion of these payroll costs were incurred as of January 31, 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable - Not a repeat finding Recommendation - The Organization should implement appropriate internal control procedures to verify grant expenditures are within the period of performance. The Organization should also implement cutoff procedures to ensure grant expenditures are captured on the accrual-basis consistent with period of performance compliance requirements and generally accepted accounting principles. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions - The Organization concurs with the finding and management will implement procedures to ensure appropriate internal control procedures are in place for period of performance and cutoff procedures related to grant expenditures. Management will implement additional internal controls at the end of the grant and the beginning of the grant to ensure accuracy of the salaries being posted are in the correct period of performance.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-11-GSAFAC-0000064672
Fiscal year end
November 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
June 17, 2025; submitted 290 days after its due date (August 31, 2024)
Federal spending
$5,925,737 · 3 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.