grantcheck

Texas · Nonprofit · $50M-$250M in federal spending

Memorial Hermann Health System

Houston, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$82,517,075 in federal awards spent, across 5 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Homeland Security$77,110,228
Department of Health and Human Services$4,650,146
Department of Defense$756,701

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000410467
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
March 30, 2026
Federal spending
$82,517,075 · 5 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000359712
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
March 31, 2025
Federal spending
$102,848,873 · 5 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000029716
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
March 27, 2024
Federal spending
$46,882,449 · 3 programs
Major programs
3
Questioned costs
$149,194 known
Score
15 of 100

Finding 2023-001

material weaknessquestioned costsother matters

Program
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (93.369, 93.421, 93.432, 93.433)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
Questioned costs
$149,194 (known)
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Federal Program:Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Nos.93.432, 93.369, 93.433, 93.421 Federal Award Numbers and Grant Period - see Table. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.303 – Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318(i) – General procurement standards states: The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.

Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed – the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurements procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) small purchase procedures – the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: The Health System did not maintain records for procurements made with federal funds sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Questioned Costs: $149,194 Context: We selected and tested five procurements with expenditures totaling $149,194 from a population of 12 procurements over $10,000 each with expenditures totaling $411,649. For all five procurements, the Health System did not have sufficient evidence to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. We did not observe multiple quotes or sole source justification for any of the five procurements. The Health System’s total R&D expenditures were $6,288,755. Of this amount, $513,467 related to procurements of good and services. Effect: The Health System did not comply with the general procurement standards per the OMB to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Cause: The Health System did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure the Health System maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Not Applicable Recommendation: The Health System should retain written documentation for procurements documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. This would include obtaining quotes from vendors for competitive procurements and documenting sole source justification for procurements, when applicable. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a corrective action plan.