grantcheck

Texas · Local government · under $2M in federal spending

Mitchell County Hospital District

Colorado City, TX

The FY2023 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 material weakness.

No FY2024 single audit on file as of October 30, 2026. For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, it was due June 30, 2025, 487 days earlier. It is expected because the FY2023 audit reported $960,360 in federal spending; an organization whose federal spending fell below the threshold would not need one.

Score: 21 of 100 (FY2023 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each824
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15815
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding55
Score21100

Federal funding, FY2023

$960,360 in federal awards spent, across 2 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Health and Human Services$960,360

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-09-GSAFAC-0000386166
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
December 3, 2025; submitted 521 days after its due date (June 30, 2024)
Federal spending
$960,360 · 2 programs
Major programs
1; qualified opinion on 1
Score
21 of 100

Finding 2023-002

material weaknessmodified opinion

Program
PROVIDER RELIEF FUND (93.498)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles; Reporting
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Assistance Listing No. 93.498

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Period 4 Expenditures Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (PUB. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat.563 and Pub. L. No. 116-139,134 Stat. 622 and 623)

Condition – The District is required to prepare and submit period 4 Provider Relief Fund reporting. This report is to be prepared using accurate financial information and submitted by the deadline established.

Questioned Costs – Unknown

Context – The District selected Option 1 for the lost revenue calculation. The District was unable to provide the underlying lost revenue calculation that materially agreed to the information submitted and reported to Health Resources and Services Administration in period 4.

Effect – The District could not support the lost revenues reported in period 4 with accurate financial information.

Cause – The District did not retain the underlying calculations and documentation of reporting methodology when the period 4 report was completed and submitted by management.

Identification as a Repeat Finding – N/A

Recommendation – Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure reports are prepared using complete and accurate information. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions –

Responsible Official: Diane Moore, Chief Financial Officer

Planned Corrective Actions –

The District has adopted a Federal Grant Reporting Policy requiring all submissions to federal or state agencies to include complete supporting documentation retained for at least seven years. A standardized Lost Revenue Calculation Template has been created to document methodology, source data, and reconciliations to general ledger balances. The CFO will ensure all future PRF and grant reports undergo a dual review and sign-off process prior to submission. Historical data for Period 4 PRF reporting has been reconstructed from audited financial records, and the District has verified that lost revenues during the eligible reporting period exceed the total PRF funds retained, demonstrating that all funds were appropriately supported from a financial standpoint. While the original internal calculation did not agree to the exact amounts reported to HRSA, the District’s current analysis and documentation substantiate the PRF funds in accordance with HRSA’s intent and guidance. Staff have completed Uniform Guidance and HRSA PRF compliance training to ensure future submissions include all required support and reconciliation.