grantcheck

Texas · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending

OAK HAVEN APARTMENTS

CONROE, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$3,146,932 in federal awards spent, across 2 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$3,146,932

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000389833
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
December 16, 2025
Federal spending
$3,146,932 · 2 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000057821
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
October 23, 2024
Federal spending
$3,176,227 · 2 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000002047
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
October 18, 2023
Federal spending
$3,211,808 · 2 programs
Major programs
2
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiency

Program
SECTION 8 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM (14.195)
Compliance requirement
Other
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Findings reference number: 2023-001 TItle and AL Number of Federal Program: Section 8 Housing Assistance (AL 14.195) Type of finding: Internal control Resolution Status: In process Population size: N/A Sample size: N/A Repeat finding: No Condition: Recertifications for tenants were not properly updated in the rent roll. Criteria: The accounting records should reflect the proper breakout between HUD and tenant rent. Effect: The breakout of total rental income between HUD subsidy and tenant rent was incorrect and had to be adjusted. Context: Upon recertification, the tenant and HUD rent were adjusted and both tenant and HUD were paying the correct amounts per the recertification, however the accounting records (rent roll) was not updated for the recertification. The total rent was correct, however reclassifications had to be made in the general ledger to properly reflect the payments made. Cause: Oversight by the property manager. Noncompliance code: S. Internal control deficiency Questioned costs: None. Reporting views of officials: Management agrees with the finding. Contract number: 114-11304. Recommendation: Upon recertification, rent roll should be updated to properly reflect the breakout between tenant and HUD rent. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:: Management is in agreement and have accepted the proposed reclassification journal entries to record in the general ledger. The property manager will be trained to update the accounting records upon recertification. Completion date: 6/30/2024