grantcheck

Colorado · Nonprofit · $10M-$50M in federal spending

PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, INC

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$10,025,617 in federal awards spent, across 4 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Health and Human Services$10,025,617

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-12-GSAFAC-0000415873
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
May 6, 2026
Federal spending
$10,025,617 · 4 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-12-GSAFAC-0000364386
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
April 11, 2025
Federal spending
$11,071,823 · 4 programs
Major programs
1
Questioned costs
$468 known
Score
17 of 100

Finding 2024-001

significant deficiencyrepeat findingquestioned costs

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
Repeat
Chain of 4 audit years; prior finding 2023-001
Questioned costs
$468 (known)
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or Specific Requirement – In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health care services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients’ ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition –The Organization determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discounts, we found that two encounters selected where the patients were charged incorrect copays. Context – In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 42,422 encounters in the population totaling $13,260,495. Sliding fee discounts provided to the two encounters totaled $468. Total discounts in the sample were $22,415. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause – Condition found was due to inadvertent errors. Effect or Potential Effect – Patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs – $468. The amount was determined by totaling all the inaccurate discounts received by the two patients. Recommendation – The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding the monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Organization has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-12-GSAFAC-0000037502
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
April 23, 2024
Federal spending
$16,633,433 · 5 programs
Major programs
1
Questioned costs
$335 known
Score
14 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiencyrepeat findingquestioned costsother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
Repeat
Chain of 3 audit years; prior finding 2022-001
Questioned costs
$335 (known)
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or Specific Requirement – In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health care services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients’ ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition – The Organization determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient’s annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. Context – In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 25,539 encounters in the population. Sliding fee discounts provided to the two encounters totaled $335. Total discounts in the sample were $13,734. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause – Condition found related to the encounters whose applications were not retained was due to missing documentation of the application. This activity occurs at the time of service by the reception team and there are times when the paperwork is not scanned into the patient’s health record. Effect or Potential Effect – Without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income, patients may have been given an improper sliding fee discount. For patients who did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount and the patient who received an incorrect co‐pay, patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs – $335. The amount was determined by totaling all of the discounts received by the two patients, and assumed the two patients without supporting documentation were ineligible for the discount received. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization's procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Organization has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.