grantcheck

Texas · Nonprofit · under $2M in federal spending

PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC

Austin, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$1,983,682 in federal awards spent, across 1 program. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Health and Human Services$1,983,682

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-12-GSAFAC-0000425453
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
August 31, 2026
Federal spending
$1,983,682 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-12-GSAFAC-0000377352
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
September 18, 2025
Federal spending
$2,802,997 · 3 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-12-GSAFAC-0000050879
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
September 13, 2024
Federal spending
$4,941,152 · 3 programs
Major programs
1
Score
6 of 100

Finding 2023-002

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 4 H8FCS40875-01-02 Program Year 2023

Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement, Suspension, & Debarment – 45 CFR 75.329

Condition – The Organization’s procurement policy established a threshold of $10,000 for small purchase procurements. This policy was not properly applied.

Questioned Costs – Unknown

Context – A sample of two procurements were tested out of a population of eleven transactions subject to procurement requirements. The population sampled represented $957,817 in Federal expenditures. The sample was not, and is not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the two procurements tested, one procurement for $54,684 was not completed in compliance with the Organization’s policy and procedures.

Effect – A purchase was made without fully adhering to Federal procurement requirements.

Cause – The Organization did not apply its procurement policy to a transaction that met the small purchases threshold.

Identification as a Repeat Finding – Not a repeat finding.

Recommendation – The Organization should review its policies and procedures to ensure all purchases using Federal grant dollars are completed in accordance with Federal procurement requirements.

Finding 2023-003

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS24150-12-00 Program Year 2023

Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342

Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information.

Questioned Costs – None

Context – The Organization was required to file one FFR and one Uniform Data Set (UDS) report during 2023. Each report was selected for testing with specific data from each report identified for testing. The sampling methodology is not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the twenty-five inputs tested, three exceptions were noted related to the FFR.

Effect – Potential errors were made on the FFR.

Cause – The Organization indicated the FFR was prepared on the accrual basis but did not accurately reflect the accruals for the final two months of the grant budget period. As a result, the Federal share of expenditures and unobligated balance of Federal funds were misstated.

Identification as a Repeat Finding – Not a repeat finding.

Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.