grantcheck

Colorado · Nonprofit · $2M-$10M in federal spending

PROJECT SUPPORT HOUSING II

Idaho Springs, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports 2 findings: 2 material weaknesses. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 29 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each1624
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15815
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding55
Score29100

Federal funding, FY2025

$2,067,111 in federal awards spent, across 1 program. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Housing and Urban Development$2,067,111

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-12-GSAFAC-0000428462
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
September 10, 2026
Federal spending
$2,067,111 · 1 program
Major programs
1; qualified opinion on 1
Score
29 of 100

Finding 2025-002

material weaknessmodified opinion

Program
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY (14.157)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition: During our audit of Project Support Housing II for the year ended December 31, 2025, we noted that management made a withdrawal totaling $12,000 from the property’s residual receipts account without obtaining the required prior written approval from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The withdrawn funds were used for eviction expenses. Criteria:HUD regulatory agreements and program requirements stipulate that withdrawals from the Residual Receipts Account must be approved in writing by HUD prior to disbursement. Specifically, the Regulatory Agreement requires that reserve funds “shall be withdrawn only with the written consent of HUD” and must be used solely for the replacement of capital items approved by HUD. Cause: The noncompliance occurred because management did not follow HUD approval procedures prior to withdrawing funds. This appears to have resulted from a misunderstanding of HUD requirements and lack of review procedures. Possible or Known Effect: By withdrawing funds from the Residual Receipts Account without HUD approval, the Organization was not in compliance with its Regulatory Agreement. This action could result in HUD sanctions, require repayment of the withdrawn funds, or otherwise affect the Organization’s future eligibility for HUD programs. The misuse of restricted funds also weakens the Organization’s ability to maintain the property in accordance with HUD standards. Recommendation: We recommend that management: • Submit proper documentation to HUD to request retroactive approval.• Implement internal controls to ensure that all future withdrawals from restricted accounts receive required HUD authorization prior to disbursement. • Provide staff training on HUD regulatory requirements related to restricted accounts. Management concurs with the finding. The Organization will initiate corrective action by submitting proper documentation to HUD to request retroactive approval and establishing procedures requiring HUD approval prior to any future withdrawals.

Finding 2025-003

material weaknessmodified opinion

Program
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY (14.157)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Organization did not make the required deposit to the residual receipts account within the timeframe prescribed by HUD. Specifically, the required residual receipts deposit for the period ended December 31, 2024, totaling $1,438, had not been made as of the date of our testing. Criteria: HUD audit guidance for residual receipts requires the Organization to establish a residual receipts account and make required deposits into that account in accordance with HUD requirements within the required timeframe. Cause: The noncompliance occurred because management did not follow HUD approval procedures prior to withdrawing funds. This appears to have resulted from a misunderstanding of HUD requirements and lack of review procedures. Effect: Failure to make the required residual receipts deposit within the required timeframe results in noncompliance with HUD residual receipts requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management assign responsibility to a designated individual for monitoring residual receipts requirements and deposit deadlines. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will assign responsibility to a designated individual for monitoring residual receipt requirements and deposit deadlines.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-12-GSAFAC-0000387227
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
May 21, 2026; submitted 233 days after its due date (September 30, 2025)
Federal spending
$2,081,140 · 1 program
Major programs
1; qualified opinion on 1
Score
21 of 100

Finding 2024-002

material weaknessmodified opinion

Program
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY (14.157)
Compliance requirement
Other
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition: During our audit of Project Support Housing II for the year ended December 31, 2024, we noted that management made withdrawals totaling $4,700 from the property’s Residual Receipts Account without obtaining the required prior written approval from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The withdrawn funds were used for maintenance expenses. Criteria: HUD regulatory agreements and program requirements stipulate that withdrawals from the Residual Receipts Account must be approved in writing by HUD prior to disbursement. Specifically, the Regulatory Agreement requires that reserve funds “shall be withdrawn only with the written consent of HUD” and must be used solely for the replacement of capital items approved by HUD. Cause: The noncompliance occurred because management did not follow HUD approval procedures prior to withdrawing funds. This appears to have resulted from a misunderstanding of HUD requirements and lack of review procedures. Effect: By withdrawing funds from the Residual Receipts Account without HUD approval, the Organization was not in compliance with its Regulatory Agreement. This action could result in HUD sanctions, require repayment of the withdrawn funds, or otherwise affect the Organization’s future eligibility for HUD programs. The misuse of restricted funds also weakens the Organization’s ability to maintain the property in accordance with HUD standards. Recommendation: We recommend that management: • Submit proper documentation to HUD to request retroactive approval. • Implement internal controls to ensure that all future withdrawals from restricted accounts receive required HUD authorization prior to disbursement. • Provide staff training on HUD regulatory requirements related to restricted accounts. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. The Organization will initiate corrective action by submitting proper documentation to HUD to request retroactive approval and establishing procedures requiring HUD approval prior to any future withdrawals.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-12-GSAFAC-0000387231
Fiscal year end
December 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
May 21, 2026; submitted 598 days after its due date (September 30, 2024)
Federal spending
$2,088,691 · 1 program
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.