grantcheck

Texas · Higher education · $10M-$50M in federal spending

Remington College

Dallas, TX

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 with questioned costs. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$40,835,701 in federal awards spent, across 2 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$40,835,701

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000381613
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
December 17, 2025
Federal spending
$40,835,701 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Questioned costs
$769 known
Score
0 of 100

Finding 2025-001

questioned costsother findings

Program
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (84.063)
Compliance requirement
Eligibility
Questioned costs
$769 (known)
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Identification of the Federal Program: United States Department of Education Federal Pell Grant Program (84.063)

Criteria: 34 CFR 690.63

Condition: Over Award of Federal Pell Grant Program Funds

Cause: No cause could be determined.

Effect: The students in question were not awarded properly based upon the students’ eligibility.

Questioned Costs: Total Questioned Costs: $769 $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds.

Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: Our review of fifty (50) student files disclosed that two (2) students were incorrectly awarded Federal Pell Grant program funds based on eligibility. Twenty five (25) of the student files were reviewed for Eligibility (EL), and twenty five (25) were reviewed for Verification (VR).

For student #20 (VR), the Institution awarded $2,465 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The student was eligible for $2,115, resulting in an over award of $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds.

For student #2 (EL), the Institution awarded $2,465 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The student was eligible for $2,046, resulting in an over award of $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds.

Subsequent to the audit, the Institution refunded $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #20 (VR). In addition the Institution refunded $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #2 (EL).

The instances of noncompliance represent an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 4% (2 of 50) from a population of 4,182 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.18% ($769 of $432,530) from a population of $36,539,535. This is a statistically valid sample.

Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.

Recommendations: We recommend that the institution review and update procedures to ensure that Federal Pell Grant awards are calculated and disbursed in accordance with 34 C.F.R. § 690.63 based on each student’s eligibility.

Views of Responsible Officials: The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendation.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000054577
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
September 10, 2024
Federal spending
$59,323,344 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000010208
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
December 13, 2023
Federal spending
$60,368,065 · 2 programs
Major programs
2
Questioned costs
$953 known
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2023-001

repeat findingquestioned costsother findings

Program
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (84.063, 84.268)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
Repeat
Chain of 2 audit years; prior finding 2022-001
Questioned costs
$953 (known)
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2023-001

Identification of the Federal Program: United States Department of Education Federal Pell Grant Program (84.063) Federal Direct Loan Program (84.268)

Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22

Condition: Incorrect Return of Title IV Funds (“R2T4”)

Cause: The Institution determined the errors to be due to human error.

Effect: Federal funds that would have been available to other eligible Title IV recipients were not available. Further, the United States Department of Education may have been subject to unnecessary interest and special allowance.

Questioned Costs: Total Questioned Costs $953. $962 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds. $(9) in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan program funds.

Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: The Institution had a total of one thousand four hundred twenty-eight (1,428) students who withdrew during the audit period. We tested the files of twenty-five (25) of those students. It was determined that three (3) R2T4’s were not calculated correctly.

For student #13, the R2T4 in question was returned on June 15, 2023, in the amount of $595 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The institutions should have recalculated the Federal Pell Grant funds to include in the R2T4 calculation. The Institution used $1,261 as Federal Pell Grant disbursed, when it should have only used the Less-than half-time amount of $420. After recalculating the Federal Pell grant, the Institution should have returned $214 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, which resulted in an under return of $460 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The Institution also used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned.

For student #AR1, the R2T4 in question was returned on May 31, 2023, in the amount of $9 in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program funds. The $9 was the amount of return of funds due by Student, and not required to be returned by the institution. The institution did not have authorization to return on the students behalf. This resulted in an over return of $9 in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program funds.

For student #AR15, the R2T4 in question was returned on October 24, 2022, in the amount of $929 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The institution should have returned $1,431 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, which resulted in an under return of $502 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The Institution used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned.

Subsequent to the audit, the Institution returned $962 to the 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #13 and AR#15. The instance of noncompliance represents an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 12.0% (3 of 25) from a population of 1,428 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.68% ($953 of 140,563) from a population of $6,743,942. This is a statistically valid sample.

Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding.

Recommendations: The Institution needs to review and update its procedures to ensure that the R2T4 calculation process is completed correctly.

Views of Responsible Officials: The institution agrees with the finding and recommendation. The Institution has planned the following immediate solutions to ensure accuracy for R2T4 calculations.

• Share Corrective Action Plan (CAP) with accountable staff. • Create a scheduled hours chart for all programs to address the incorrect number of days being calculated in a payment period. Additionally, the Institution will standardize the usage of the automated calculations within the Institution’s Student Information System (Anthology) to help minimize potential human errors within our processes. • Evaluate and update R2T4 policies and procedures as necessary to incorporate these solutions. • Train staff on R2T4 calculations as well as conduct ongoing training on an annual basis. o This will also incorporate training on the Institution’s R2T4 policies, including covering the requirement that student files should be reviewed for appropriate student authorizations as well as the full-time/part-time status of a student. • Re-train staff on the Institution’s R2T4 peer review process. • Establish target dates to review CAP effectiveness. o The Institution will conduct a monthly review of the CAP’s effectiveness for the first six months after implementation of the CAP and then will conduct periodic reviews of the CAP thereafter.