grantcheck

Colorado · Nonprofit · under $2M in federal spending

RIVER NETWORK

Boulder, CO

The FY2024 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 material weakness.

Score: 8 of 100 (FY2024 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each824
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score8100

Federal funding, FY2024

$791,181 in federal awards spent, across 5 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Agriculture$378,404
Department of the Interior$366,270
Environmental Protection Agency$46,507

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-09-GSAFAC-0000357471
Fiscal year end
September 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
March 4, 2025
Federal spending
$791,181 · 5 programs
Major programs
2
Score
8 of 100

Finding 2024-001

material weaknessother matters

Program
INFLATION REDUCTION ACT URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM (10.727); NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CONSERVATION, PROTECTION, OUTREACH, AND EDUCATION (15.954)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Finding 2024-001

Procurement, Suspension and Debarment 15.954 National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach, and Education and 10.727 Inflation Reduction Act Urban and Community Forestry Program.

Criteria: A recipient of federal awards is required to ensure that contractors and subrecipients are checked against the debarment list and ensure there are controls in place over procurement per 2 CFR section 180.220.

Condition and Context: The Organization did not check a contractor and a subrecipient against the debarment list. The Organization did not have a formally documented or enacted process in place to ensure all procurement requirements were completed accurately and timely. And there was also no underlying supporting documentation showing that subrecipients and contractors were checked against the debarment list.

Cause: The Organization was not aware that contractors and subrecipients needed to be checked against the debarment list.

Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient documentation, the Organization may have contracted with an Organization that was debarred. The related review of debarment was not documented. Without sufficient documentation and monitoring controls, the Organization may not be able to detect an error in procurement timely.

Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update their policies and procedures manual to ensure testing contractors and subrecipients to the debarment list when expenses reach federal limits.

Responsible Official’s Response: Management agrees with the recommendation to establish and follow a documented internal control process over the review of procurement. Staff will work with management to ensure that subrecipients and contractors with expenses over federal limits will be tested against the debarment list. Additionally, staff members working in areas concerning this process will be trained to ensure process adherence.