grantcheck

Colorado · Local government · $10M-$50M in federal spending

St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J

Longmont, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$23,612,937 in federal awards spent, across 22 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$13,575,929
Department of Agriculture$9,548,916
Department of Health and Human Services$293,575

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000394157
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
January 6, 2026
Federal spending
$23,612,937 · 22 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000064377
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
November 5, 2024
Federal spending
$25,108,533 · 19 programs
Major programs
3
Questioned costs
$221 known
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2024-001

significant deficiencyquestioned costsother matters

Program
CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER (10.553, 10.555, 10.559)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
Questioned costs
$221 (known)
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Per 7 CFR Part 245.6a, Local Educational Agencies (LEA), such as the District, must verify the current free and reduced eligibility status of sampled students. Once this verification is complete, for those students with whose eligibility changed as a result of the verification, the LEA is required to change the eligibility status for those students so that the accurate amount of federal reimbursement is determined by the District. Condition: The District recalculated the income incorrectly for one student, based on the documentation returned by the student during the verification process. The incorrect recalculation led the District to conclude that the eligibility status of the student did not need to change, when the status should have been changed to a “paid” status.Questioned costs: $ 221 (known) Context: The district had 74 error prone applications. Of that 74, 32 applications (which covered 52 student accounts) were randomly selected for verification through the standard Federal process. 8 of the 32 applications selected for verification were tested in the single audit. One of the eight students sampled contained an incorrect recalculation of wages, which is an error rate of 12.5%. Cause: Inexperienced personnel and an oversight in the review process led to the District not catching the miscalculation. Effect: Compliance with the verification requirements for this program is not being met. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District continue to train the personnel involved with this program so that they can identify when a recalculation of income is incorrect. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000017447
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
January 29, 2024
Federal spending
$26,782,221 · 21 programs
Major programs
3
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.