grantcheck

Arizona · Nonprofit · $10M-$50M in federal spending

Sun Life Family Health Center, Inc.

Casa Grande, AZ

The FY2025 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 0 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score0100

Federal funding, FY2025

$27,211,650 in federal awards spent, across 8 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Agriculture$20,930,520
Department of Health and Human Services$6,124,809
Department of Labor$156,321

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-05-GSAFAC-0000379540
Fiscal year end
May 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
November 18, 2025
Federal spending
$27,211,650 · 8 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-05-GSAFAC-0000053512
Fiscal year end
May 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
October 8, 2024
Federal spending
$10,370,161 · 8 programs
Major programs
2
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2024-002

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2024 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number 93.224 and 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts Condition – Patients did not receive the proper sliding fee adjustments under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Costs – None Context – A sample of 25 patients was tested out of a total population of 177,429 encounters. Two patients did not receive the proper sliding fee adjustments. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Effect – Incorrect sliding fee discounts were given to patients. Cause – The Organization did not comply with its sliding fee policy. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – The Organization concurs with the finding and management has implemented procedures to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. The Office Managers will review all new sliding fee application on a monthly basis to ensure accuracy. The Billing Manager will conduct quarterly audits of sliding fee claims to ensure the adjustments are entered correctly by the billing department.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-05-GSAFAC-0000001731
Fiscal year end
May 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
October 13, 2023
Federal spending
$12,703,250 · 12 programs
Major programs
4
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.