grantcheck

Colorado · Nonprofit · $10M-$50M in federal spending

Sunrise Community Health

Evans, CO

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 material weakness. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 16 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each824
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15815
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score16100

Federal funding, FY2025

$14,312,902 in federal awards spent, across 5 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Agriculture$7,855,377
Department of Health and Human Services$6,457,525

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-03-GSAFAC-0000380241
Fiscal year end
March 31, 2025
Accepted by FAC
September 11, 2025
Federal spending
$14,312,902 · 5 programs
Major programs
1; qualified opinion on 1
Score
16 of 100

Finding 2025-001

material weaknessmodified opinion

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or Specific Requirement Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.” Condition and Context During our testing of 40 sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified four visits where an incorrect sliding fee was given to a patient based on their income and family size. Effect Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause The sliding fee discount error was a result of a dental electronic medical record conversion in fiscal year 2025. During quarter three of fiscal year 2025, the Organization’s staff identified an issue within the dental electronic medical record where it was populating the incorrect federal poverty level for patients based on the income level and family size input by the Organization’s staff. This caused the incorrect sliding fee adjustment to be applied to patient balances. Recommendation We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter. Views of Responsible Officials Management will review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter. Management meetings will be scheduled with the COO, Director of Operations, and Dental Billing Supervisor(s) to provide updates on progress. Periodic internal auditing of sliding fee scale dental files will be completed. Quarterly management review of sliding fee scale program progress until Athena Dental is fully integrated with Athena Medical, where electronic health record issues were not detected regarding sliding fee scale adjustments.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-03-GSAFAC-0000052567
Fiscal year end
March 31, 2024
Accepted by FAC
August 16, 2024
Federal spending
$16,470,252 · 5 programs
Major programs
1
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-03-GSAFAC-0000000886
Fiscal year end
March 31, 2023
Accepted by FAC
October 10, 2023
Federal spending
$15,203,774 · 7 programs
Major programs
3
Score
14 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.

Condition and Context During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.

Effect The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.

Questioned Costs None identified.

Cause The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.

Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.

Views of Responsible Officials Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.

Finding 2023-002

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Procurement and suspension and debarment
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.

Condition and Context We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:

• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by 2 CFR 200.

• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).

Effect The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.

Questioned Costs None identified.

Cause The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.

Recommendation • We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.

• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.

Views of Responsible Officials The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.

Finding 2023-003

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM CLUSTER (93.224, 93.527)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Criteria or Specific Requirement Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”

Condition and Context During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.

Effect Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.

Questioned Costs None identified.

Cause Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.

Recommendation We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.

Views of Responsible Officials The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.