grantcheck

Arizona · Local government · $10M-$50M in federal spending

TUBA CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.15

TUBA CITY, AZ

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 3 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score3100

Federal funding, FY2025

$22,657,098 in federal awards spent, across 13 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$21,087,264
Department of Agriculture$1,427,657
Department of the Interior$142,177

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000409526
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
March 30, 2026
Federal spending
$22,657,098 · 13 programs
Major programs
3
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2025-002

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
IMPACT AID (84.041)
Compliance requirement
Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

2025-002 Title I Payroll Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Program Title: Title I LEA Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Passthrough Entity: Arizona Department of Education Passthrough Number: 25FT1TTI-511183-01A Compliance Requirement: B. Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Finding Type: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No. Condition/Context: The District does not have a system in internal control to properly track the time worked in federal projects. For four out of 25 Title I payroll transactions tested, the employees were completely paid using Title I monies, however the hours reported on the timecard for grant activities did not agree with the total hours worked. Criteria: Payroll made with federal project fund should be supported by documentation showing the hours worked with the activities approved as for the federal project. Effect: Without proper internal controls over time tracking and approval for federal programs, the District could overpay or underpay the portion of payroll for the federal program without detecting the error. Cause: Management oversight. Recommendation: We recommend the District have a second employee verify and approve time sheets for works related to federal projects. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with this finding.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000362650
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
March 28, 2025
Federal spending
$16,197,905 · 16 programs
Major programs
1
Going concern
The auditor included a going-concern paragraph.
Score
5 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000035907
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
March 31, 2024
Federal spending
$15,849,951 · 16 programs
Major programs
2
Score
11 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiencyrepeat finding

Program
IMPACT AID (84.041)
Compliance requirement
Special tests and provisions
Repeat
Chain of 2 audit years; prior finding 2022-001
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

2023-001 Davis-Bacon Act Compliance CFDA Number 84.041 Program Title Impact Aid Federal Agency U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement N. Special Tests and Provisions Finding Type Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs N/A Repeat Finding: Yes, Similar to 2022-001. Condition/Context: The District did not retain documentation sufficient to determine the Davis-Bacon compliance clause was included in advertised specifications for one construction project paid with federal Impact Aid funds. Criteria: Department of Labor (DOL) 29 CFR part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction. Non-federal entities shall include in their federally funded construction contracts in excess of $2,000, that are subject to the Wage Rate Requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act, a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the U.S. Department of Labor weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). This reporting is often done using Optional Form WH-347, which includes the required statement of compliance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the notification requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. As a result, the contractor could be subject to penalties and fines, and possible debarment from federal contracting if prevailing wages were not paid. Cause: The District did not have the adequate review procedures in place to ensure bid documents included notification that federal Impact Aid monies were to be used for payment of the construction projects and the contractors needed to be in compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish proper review procedures of bid documents to ensure that any federally funded construction projects in excess of $2,000 the contractors are notified the projects are being funded with federal Impact Aid funds and the contractors are required to be in compliance with the Davis Bacon Act.