grantcheck

Arizona · Local government · $2M-$10M in federal spending

Winslow Unified School District No. 1

Winslow, AZ

The FY2025 single audit reports 1 finding: 1 significant deficiency. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024, FY2025.

Score: 3 of 100 (FY2025 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each39
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph05
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score3100

Federal funding, FY2025

$9,371,306 in federal awards spent, across 14 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of Education$7,712,563
Department of Agriculture$1,281,746
Department of Justice$291,269

FY2025 audit

FAC record
2025-06-GSAFAC-0000410631
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2025
Accepted by FAC
March 30, 2026
Federal spending
$9,371,306 · 14 programs
Major programs
2
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2025-003

significant deficiencyother matters

Program
IMPACT AID (84.041)
Compliance requirement
Eligibility
FAC record
FY2025 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

2025-003 ELIGIBILITY OVER TITLE I

Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Grantor Number: 25FT1TTI-511407-01A Questioned Costs: $-0- Compliance Requirement: E. Eligibility Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Noncompliance (Other Matter), significant deficiency in internal control Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.

Condition/Context: During our testing of school eligibility and funding, we discovered the District did not maintain records that agreed to the low-income student counts as reported to the Arizona Department of Education to properly allocate Title I funding by poverty level.

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance compliance supplement.

Cause: Management oversight and turnover in the federal grant department.

Effect: Noncompliance and internal control weakness.

Recommendation: We recommend the District to review its internal control procedures of federal programs to ensure documentation is maintained to support the allocation of Title I funding based on the poverty level of individual school sites.

Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with this finding. See the corrective action plan.

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000363673
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
March 28, 2025
Federal spending
$9,043,472 · 12 programs
Major programs
2
Score
0 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000036246
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
April 2, 2024
Federal spending
$9,881,717 · 12 programs
Major programs
2
Questioned costs
$71 known
Score
3 of 100

Finding 2023-001

significant deficiencyquestioned costs

Program
CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER (10.555)
Compliance requirement
Reporting
Questioned costs
$71 (known)
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

2023-001 REPORTING Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.533, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Grantor Number: 7AZ300AZ3 Questioned Costs: $71 – meal reimbursement over-claims. Type of Finding: Noncompliance, significant deficiency Compliance Requirement: L. Reporting Condition/Context: The District overclaimed meals served by 16 lunches, resulting in an overpayment of $71. Criteria: The District must follow Uniform Guidance and ensure that meal reimbursement claims are accurately reported and adequately supported. Cause: Clerical error. Effect: Noncompliance and internal control weakness. The District was overpaid $71. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish proper internal controls over the preparation meal reimbursement claims to eliminate clerical errors. View of Responsible Official: The District’s corrective action plan presented in a separate document includes the views and planned corrective action of its responsible officials. We are not required to and have not audited these responses and planned corrective actions and therefore provide no assurances as to their accuracy. Contact person: Casey Hancock, Business Manager.