grantcheck

Arizona · Nonprofit · under $2M in federal spending

Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona

Tucson, AZ

The FY2024 single audit reports no findings. Audits on file for FY2023–FY2025: FY2023, FY2024.

No FY2025 single audit on file as of October 30, 2026. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, it was due March 31, 2026, 213 days earlier. It is expected because the FY2024 audit reported $1,454,492 in federal spending; an organization whose federal spending fell below the threshold would not need one.

Score: 5 of 100 (FY2024 audit)

The sum of eight parts, each read from the audit. How the score works.

PartRulePointsMax
Material weaknesses8 points each024
Significant deficiencies3 points each09
Repeat findings5 points each015
Longest repeat chain2 years 3, 3 years 6, 4 years 9, 5+ years 12012
Modified major-program opinionsqualified 8 each; any adverse or disclaimer 15015
Questioned costsknown amount of $25,000 or more, by share and dollars015
Going concernauditor included a going-concern paragraph55
Prior-year latenessprior-year audit late or not filed, scored only with a finding05
Score5100

Federal funding, FY2024

$1,454,492 in federal awards spent, across 2 programs. Largest funding agencies:

AgencySpent
Department of the Treasury$1,452,051
Department of Agriculture$2,441

FY2024 audit

FAC record
2024-06-GSAFAC-0000353452
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2024
Accepted by FAC
February 3, 2025
Federal spending
$1,454,492 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Going concern
The auditor included a going-concern paragraph.
Score
5 of 100

No findings reported.

FY2023 audit

FAC record
2023-06-GSAFAC-0000033123
Fiscal year end
June 30, 2023
Accepted by FAC
May 23, 2024
Federal spending
$1,602,934 · 2 programs
Major programs
1
Score
11 of 100

Finding 2023-005

significant deficiency

Program
CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles; Reporting
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition: The CFO’s reporting of major program costs through the State of Arizona’s grant management system (eCivis) was not reviewed by a second individual. In addition, there was no independent review of the payroll registers selected during major program testing.

Criteria: To better segregate duties, payroll and other costs charged to the major program should be reviewed and approved by a second individual.

Cause and effect: The internal controls of the Foundation were not functioning as designed, resulting in an increased risk of fraud and error. There was an accumulated variance of $7,947 between costs reported through e-Civis and the accounting system.

Recommendation: To better segregate duties, I recommend that governmental grant reports and the payroll registers be reviewed by the CEO or other key employee.

Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation will have the staffed CEO review and sign off on all reports and payroll registers in general with a specific focus on those tied to government grants.

Finding 2023-006

significant deficiency

Program
CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (21.027)
Compliance requirement
Activities allowed or unallowed; Allowable costs/cost principles
FAC record
FY2023 audit on fac.gov
Finding text from the filing

Condition: There was an individual who had formerly worked for the Foundation in the previous fiscal year that was an employee of one of the Foundation’s partner agencies during the year under audit. This individual was compensated $20,000 through the Foundation’s payroll system during the year ended June 30, 2023, although she was no longer an employee of the Foundation. This payment was supported by an invoice from the former employee for hours worked between July and October of 2022 at her new employer related to this major program. There was no documented approval by the partner agency. This payment was charged as salaries to the major program.

In addition, there was only one employee (program manager) who charged time to the major program, except as noted in the preceding paragraph. There was no authorized rate of pay on file for this employee.

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i), payroll costs charged to federal awards must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. In accordance with Department of Labor regulations implementing the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees must also be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day.

Cause and effect: Management believed the individual was undercompensated by her current employer, who is a subcontractor of the Foundation, for time spent on the major program. This additional payment was reported to the State of Arizona by management when paid.

Recommendation: I recommend that an authorized rate of pay be included in all employees’ human resources files. Any independent contractors should be compensated as such, based on approved contracts, and charged to federal grants accordingly. Views of Responsible Officials: The Foundation confirms all employees have rate of pay documentation in their employee files. The Foundation is developing and will implement stronger policies around contractors engaged with the organization with oversight to contractors pay provided by the staffed CEO.